January 1974
"The Moorlands Monster!"
Gardner Fox (writer), Gene Colan (pencils), Tom Palmer (inks), John Costanza (letters), Roy Thomas (editor)
Dracula and Lenore walk out of the mirror into an abandoned chapel near an English moor in the present day and waste no time in finding victims. Rachel, Taj, and Frank appear through the same mirror and find the inspector they worked with before, who has been looking for them. He tells them that a corpse drained of blood had been found in the moors as well as sightings of a shaggy monster. Rachel warns the local aristocrats, the Derings, who tell her that one of their servants went missing. The vampire hunters find and confront Dracula and Lenore at the chapel where Dracula casually sacrifices Lenore to save himself.
After Dracula escapes, Rachel and the others find the body of the Derings' servant. Lord Dering admits that several hereditary illnesses run in his family, which causes a male child in every few generations to develop a deformed body covered by hair, and the latest to inherit the disease was his son Randolph, who was secretly left to live in the chapel with the servant as the provider of his meals. Thanks to a hint from Lord Derling, the vampire hunters follow Dracula to a ruined castle nearby, where he manages to subdue Taj and trap Frank and Rachel in a dungeon, but not before he taunts Frank by suggesting that he might also turn into a vampire. Thinking they're facing a slow death, Rachel and Frank grow romantically closer while Frank worries he cannot start a relationship with Rachel due to the possibility he may become a vampire thanks to Dracula's legacy. In the end, they are rescued by Randolph Dering.
Wha...?
The narration describes Dracula and Lenore being watched by the Moorland Monster when they first enter the chapel, but six demonic eyes are drawn (in addition to a glimpse of the Moorland Monster's body.) I guess they were supposed to be bats...?
How Not to Write Dialogue
Poor Taj is referred to as a "mute servant" twice.
Comments
Marv Wolfman's rightfully celebrated run begins next issue and, frankly, it cannot start soon enough. This issue is just a showcase of squandered ideas. Lenore, who really wasn't much of a character to start with, is killed off without affecting the plot. The supposed centerpiece of the story, the "Moorland Monster", is a total wash, despite the build-up. All the narration's talk of him wanting revenge for the servant's death and all the hints that he is capable of putting up a vicious fight, and all you get is he rescues the heroes from a medieval pit? I know comic book covers are notoriously deceptive when it comes to the actual plots of issues, but would it have been so hard to have the Moorland Monster have a fight with Dracula or just be involved with the development of the story in any way before the very end?! What's even more inexplicable is how characters constantly assure each other that Dracula, not the Moorland Monster, is responsible for the deaths, even though no one posits him as a suspect. In other words, the characters are responding to a murder mystery that doesn't even exist.
To be fair, the idea that Frank would somehow "inherit" Dracula's condition is a neat if sorely undeveloped parallel to the origin of the Moorland Monster. Also the fact that Frank is a direct descendant of Dracula hasn't really been exploited since the very beginning of the series. Nonetheless the idea doesn't quite work, if only because Fox was apparently just planning to use it as a contrived source of angst for Frank and Rachel, so it's not a surprise that Marv Wolfman never really followed up on that particular plot idea.
As always, the art goes a long way to salvage the issue. The designs for the Moorland Monster are very well-done, although it would have been better if he actually had anything to do...
Footnotes
Page 12, Panel 3 - Lord Dering claims his son suffers from two genetic illnesses, rachitis and naevus pilosis. "Rachitis", much more commonly known as rickets, is a bone disease that can lead to deformities in adulthood, but instead of being genetic it's caused by calcium and vitamin D deficiencies in childhood. "Naevus pilosis" is a reference to another actual medical condition, although the correct phrase is actually "nevus pilosus", which is simply a mole from which body hair grows. Maybe Gardner Fox thought he was referring to hypertrichosis, a rare hereditary condition where the victim grows a large amount of body hair, or maybe it was an odd joke.
(Quick Note: I hate to do this again to my fine readers - all five of you - but I won't be updating until next weekend since I'm going on a vacation to visit friends until after New Year's. Given all the moving and work I've been doing the past month, I just feel like I didn't have a "proper" holiday around Thanksgiving or Christmas, so here it is. I'll be back with some more bondage-loving KGB assassins, Dracula, and something new!)
